Effective 2011 Political Investment No Longer Voluntary

raf

At our Mid-Winter Board of Directors meeting this past Saturday, the California Association of Realtors® overwhelmingly voted on a motion out of the Political Affairs Committee to begin assessing every Realtor® the amount of $49 effective in 2011 for the purpose of funding our political activities.

At the urging of the Government Affairs Director sub-forum, CAR adopted the concept during our October meetings, directing legal staff to determine the most efficient way to implement the policy. The determination, published as an Issues Briefing Paper prior to Januarys meeting, recommended a ‘political assessment opt-over approach’, which was ultimately the direction voted on by the BOD. The opt-over provision allows the member to determine whether the investment amount shall be directed toward the Realtor® Action Fund or ‘opted-over’ to an alternative account.

A bit of history. Since 2000 the CAR political action committees (PAC’s) have grown and shrunk based on membership numbers and the real estate market. In the 2001-2002 election cycle, the PAC’s were funded by $3.8 million of voluntary political contributions. By 2006-2007, the PAC’s funding had increased to $10.1 million. In the past three years those receipts have fallen to just $2.5 million for 2009. As our organization faces increasing challenges at the local, state and federal level, that amount is simply not enough to keep us as a serious player in the political arena.

In addition to our ongoing local and state efforts, we are facing three additional challenges in the coming years that may require significant expenditures.

First there is a proposal on the June 2010 ballot to allow open primaries. If approved by voters this will dramatically increase competitiveness in at least 32 state legislative races. With more competition, the more costly each race becomes and the greater the demands [placed on our PAC’s.

Second, the 2012 re-districting will radically alter the political landscape for Senate and Assembly Districts. That may place additional demands on our PAC’s when combined with the potential for open primaries.

There will also be increased demand in both the 2012 (Gubernatorial) and 2014 (Presidential) election cycles.

With over $19 million spent during the past year, NAR ranks as one of the top ten lobbying organization in the country and the #1 grassroots trade association lobby in Washington. Having achieved so much on behalf of our members and for our customers private property rights, we cannot abandon that position now. We’ve invested too much time and money to make it happen, we can’tsimply walk away from the opportunity we’ve created for ourselves.

In 2009 voluntary contributions to our Realtor Action Fund fell to just 19% of members from a peak of 35% in 2004. That means 81% of our members were freeloading and letting a few of us carry the weight. That’s right. 81% of our members could not see their way clear to investing $49 in their own political survival. $4 a month was too great a burden. That’s less than a #3 special at In-N-Out, one latte, 2 lines in the classifieds.

The program has been vetted legally to assure it complies with California laws on campaign contributions and is consistent with other state and federal laws. No doubt the will be some legal challenges from people who would rather spend thousands on attorney fees than $49 for their own political survival – but CAR is confident it will prevail – especially since CAR is not the first or the only trade association to implement this structure. Dentists, teachers and others have long enjoyed a fund-raising advantage since all members invest in their PAC. And we won’t even talk about the unions or the recent decision by the Supreme  Court allowing corporations to fund candidates from their general fund.

For those members with a religious or cultural aversion to political advocacy, you can direct your investment into an issues oriented fund that will not be used to directly support candidates.

This is a terrific move for CAR and one that has long been advocated as a way to equitably share the cost of our successful advocacy program across the membership rather than just saddling a few of us with the burden. It also means I won’t be hitting you up for a contribution every time I see you. That in itself should be worth $49 bucks.

There will be more information available on the CAR website soon and I’ll make sure that is posted for your review.


Be Sociable, Share!
  • Thanks, Gene, for this post and explanation of the CAR board adoption of program for mandatory opt-over for the Realtor Action Fund starting next yet.

    Let’s continue to tell our REALTOR friends … “Get Into Politics or Get out of Business”.

    • Thanks Harrison. No doubt Realtors in your area will view this with mixed reactions as they have out here but in the long run it’s the best thing we could do. Just getting that 3% withholding defeated yesterday saves our members hundreds of dollars in advance payments.

  • Cathy Asbury

    I think you ought to ask yourself if 81% of your colleagues are ‘free loaders’ unwilling to spend $4/month for your agenda, or rather is the CAR board out of touch with 81% of its membership, so that it has to FORCE the people that placed them in a leadership position to IMPOSE this fee. Who decides they have the time and information to e/m me a call to arms on some legal issue, but not the time and information at hand to ask me if I believe in what they are ballistic about? Or maybe its just that 81% of the membership aren’t able to understand what’s best for them? Do NOT get me started on the Teacher’s Union! The last thing I want to have is my trade association mirror that bunch of self-serving bureaucrats…

    • I believe CAR’s legislative agenda is, for the most part, very attuned to members needs although representing the wants of 180,000 diverse practitioners across the entire state is not always easy. I think in a lot of cases the message isn’t being brought to the members or explained as it should be – and that is partially CAR’s fault but mostly rests on local associations who have no political bent. And yes, I do believe 81% of my colleagues are freeloaders even for $4/month. I know it’s been a tough couple years for the market but if $4/mo makes the difference between being in business or not, then they should re-evaluate their career choice. Without CAR’s advocacy, recognized as among the most effective in the state, the plight of the Realtor would be much worse today. You’re either going to be at the table or you’ll be on the menu – it’s just that simple. If you disagree with what is happening or what is being represented on your behalf, I encourage you to get involved, attend association meetings, discuss the issues with your association leadership and government affairs people at the local and state level – they are very approachable. And if you have a better idea on how to raise the funds necessary to stay relevant in this political climate – please share it. The rest of us were unable to come up with a more palatable solution – hence the $49 assessment.