<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective 2011 Political Investment No Longer Voluntary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Wunderlich</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/comment-page-1/#comment-14641</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Wunderlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1200#comment-14641</guid>
		<description>I believe CAR&#039;s legislative agenda is, for the most part, very attuned to members needs although representing the wants of 180,000 diverse practitioners across the entire state is not always easy. I think in a lot of cases the message isn&#039;t being brought to the members or explained as it should be - and that is partially CAR&#039;s fault but mostly rests on local associations who have no political bent. And yes, I do believe 81% of my colleagues are freeloaders even for $4/month. I know it&#039;s been a tough couple years for the market but if $4/mo makes the difference between being in business or not, then they should re-evaluate their career choice. Without CAR&#039;s advocacy, recognized as among the most effective in the state, the plight of the Realtor would be much worse today. You&#039;re either going to be at the table or you&#039;ll be on the menu - it&#039;s just that simple. If you disagree with what is happening or what is being represented on your behalf, I encourage you to get involved, attend association meetings, discuss the issues with your association leadership and government affairs people at the local and state level - they are very approachable. And if you have a better idea on how to raise the funds necessary to stay relevant in this political climate - please share it. The rest of us were unable to come up with a more palatable solution - hence the $49 assessment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe CAR&#8217;s legislative agenda is, for the most part, very attuned to members needs although representing the wants of 180,000 diverse practitioners across the entire state is not always easy. I think in a lot of cases the message isn&#8217;t being brought to the members or explained as it should be &#8211; and that is partially CAR&#8217;s fault but mostly rests on local associations who have no political bent. And yes, I do believe 81% of my colleagues are freeloaders even for $4/month. I know it&#8217;s been a tough couple years for the market but if $4/mo makes the difference between being in business or not, then they should re-evaluate their career choice. Without CAR&#8217;s advocacy, recognized as among the most effective in the state, the plight of the Realtor would be much worse today. You&#8217;re either going to be at the table or you&#8217;ll be on the menu &#8211; it&#8217;s just that simple. If you disagree with what is happening or what is being represented on your behalf, I encourage you to get involved, attend association meetings, discuss the issues with your association leadership and government affairs people at the local and state level &#8211; they are very approachable. And if you have a better idea on how to raise the funds necessary to stay relevant in this political climate &#8211; please share it. The rest of us were unable to come up with a more palatable solution &#8211; hence the $49 assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Asbury</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/comment-page-1/#comment-14371</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Asbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1200#comment-14371</guid>
		<description>I think you ought to ask yourself if 81% of your colleagues are &#039;free loaders&#039; unwilling to spend $4/month for your agenda, or rather is the CAR board out of touch with 81% of its membership, so that it has to FORCE the people that placed them in a leadership position to IMPOSE this fee.  Who decides they have the time and information to e/m me a call to arms on some legal issue, but not the time and information at hand to ask me if I believe in what they are ballistic about?  Or maybe its just that 81% of the membership aren&#039;t able to understand what&#039;s best for them?  Do NOT get me started on the Teacher&#039;s Union!  The last thing I want to have is my trade association mirror that bunch of self-serving bureaucrats...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you ought to ask yourself if 81% of your colleagues are &#8216;free loaders&#8217; unwilling to spend $4/month for your agenda, or rather is the CAR board out of touch with 81% of its membership, so that it has to FORCE the people that placed them in a leadership position to IMPOSE this fee.  Who decides they have the time and information to e/m me a call to arms on some legal issue, but not the time and information at hand to ask me if I believe in what they are ballistic about?  Or maybe its just that 81% of the membership aren&#8217;t able to understand what&#8217;s best for them?  Do NOT get me started on the Teacher&#8217;s Union!  The last thing I want to have is my trade association mirror that bunch of self-serving bureaucrats&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Wunderlich</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/comment-page-1/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Wunderlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1200#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>Thanks Harrison. No doubt Realtors in your area will view this with mixed reactions as they have out here but in the long run it&#039;s the best thing we could do. Just getting that 3% withholding defeated yesterday saves our members hundreds of dollars in advance payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Harrison. No doubt Realtors in your area will view this with mixed reactions as they have out here but in the long run it&#8217;s the best thing we could do. Just getting that 3% withholding defeated yesterday saves our members hundreds of dollars in advance payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrison</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/02/07/effective-2011-political-investment-no-longer-voluntary/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1200#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Gene, for this post and explanation of the CAR board adoption of program for mandatory opt-over for the Realtor Action Fund starting next yet.

Let&#039;s continue to tell our REALTOR friends ... &quot;Get Into Politics or Get  out of Business&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gene, for this post and explanation of the CAR board adoption of program for mandatory opt-over for the Realtor Action Fund starting next yet.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s continue to tell our REALTOR friends &#8230; &#8220;Get Into Politics or Get  out of Business&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

