<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SRCAR GAD &#187; meg whitman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadblog.srcar.org/tag/meg-whitman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FYI &#8211; Gov Candidate Whitman Releases &#8216;Plan for California&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/16/fyi-gov-candidate-whitman-releases-plan-for-california/</link>
		<comments>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/16/fyi-gov-candidate-whitman-releases-plan-for-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Wunderlich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meg whitman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[View this in a web browser Forward to a friend Friend, Today, Meg released &#8220;Building A New California&#8221;, a magazine-style policy agenda that introduces her plan for addressing California&#8217;s challenges. Meg is very proud of this agenda, which we published in a 48-page printed edition and posted on our website for all Californians to see. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="650">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="650">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="625">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="625">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="625">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="37">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="37">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="37" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="37" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="281" valign="bottom"><a href="http://go.emaildirect.com/_p_ga4x2nq3bafubmkxna4c68qxbgfuzmwxrgfuzutsbgrx28tsja4vnbjfs89c37grs6kunyfre2tcntdvy2munyjf464knbgvzlra_p_/click.emaildirect"><img id="_x0000_i1025" src="http://images.emaildirect.com/p/t/custom/whitman/whit_logo2.jpg" border="0" alt="Meg 2010 - A New California" width="281" height="89" /></a></td>
<td width="307">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="307">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="307" valign="bottom"><a href="http://go.emaildirect.com/_p_ga4x2nq3bafubmkxna4c68qxbgfuzmwxrgfuzutsbgre2utsja4vnbjfs89c37grs6kunyfre2tcntdvy2munyjf464knbgvzlra_p_/trouble.htm">View this in a web browser</a><br />
<a href="http://go.emaildirect.com/_p_ga4x2nq3bafubmkxna4c68qxbgfuzmwxrgfuzutsbgre2utsja4vnbjfs89c37grs6kunyfre2tcntdvy2munyjf464knbgvzlra_p_/ftof.htm">Forward to a friend</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="307" valign="bottom"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="625"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="619" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="550">
<h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Friend,</strong></p>
<p><strong>Today, Meg released <a href="http://go.emaildirect.com/_p_ga4x2nq3bafubmkxna4c68qxbgfuzmwxrgfuzutsbgre2utsja4vnbjfs89c37grs6kunyfre2tcntdvy2munyjf464knbgvzlra_p_/click.emaildirect">&#8220;Building A New California&#8221;</a>, a       magazine-style policy agenda that introduces her plan for addressing       California&#8217;s challenges.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Meg is very proud of this agenda, which we published in a 48-page printed       edition and posted on our website for all Californians to see. </strong> <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>She believes that voters deserve to hear where all of the candidates       stand on the issues. </strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>On the campaign trail, Meg has met with employers, policy experts and       community leaders to lay out her governing philosophy and goals. In       &#8220;Building A New California&#8221;, she outlines how she will create       jobs, cut government spending and fix schools as well as other issues       important to our state.</strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Building A New California&#8221; is available online </strong> <strong><a href="http://go.emaildirect.com/_p_ga4x2nq3bafubmkxna4c68qxbgfuzmwxrgfuzutsbgre2utsja4vnbjfs89c37grs6kunyfre2tcntdvy2munyjf464knbgvzlra_p_/click.emaildirect">here</a>.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I hope you&#8217;ll find the time to read through it and I encourage you to       share Meg&#8217;s vision for California with your friends and family. </strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>I think you&#8217;ll agree she&#8217;s the best candidate to lead our state. And       working together, we can build A New California.</strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Jillian Hasner</strong> <strong><br />
Campaign Manager<br />
Meg Whitman for Governor 2010</strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="625">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="619" valign="top">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="550">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="550"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td width="623"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="623"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/16/fyi-gov-candidate-whitman-releases-plan-for-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meg Whitman &#8211; The Real Deal?</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/03/meg-whitman-the-real-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/03/meg-whitman-the-real-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Wunderlich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gino's Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good News You Can Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q & A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Wunderlich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meg whitman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/?p=1266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Monday I had the opportunity to hear Meg Whitman at a small meet &#38; greet. Whitman is one of two Republicans running to be Governor of this great state of California, though why any sane person would do that I&#8217;m still not certain. I made the trek with a couple other political hacks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><big>This past Monday I had the opportunity to hear <a href="http://www.megwhitman.com/">Meg Whitman</a> at a small meet &amp; greet. Whitman is one of two Republicans running to be Governor of this great state of California, though why any sane person would do that I&#8217;m still not certain. I made the trek with a couple other political hacks and cynics who had similar questions about her sanity, her commitment and her qualifications.</big></p>
<p><big>We all came away converts.</big></p>
<p><big><a href="http://www.megwhitman.com/"><img src="http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh317/genewunderlich/people/whitman3-1-10.jpg" alt="meg whitman" /></a>First, a few basics. Whitman is richer than God. As the former CEO of eBay, she is a billionaire and she has been spending a bunch of her own money on campaign ads since last year to get her message out. This is in contrast to the other Republican candidate who has done nothing but whine about what Whitman is doing, and Jerry Brown, who finally decided to throw his hat in the ring yesterday and about whom we know too much. I got no problem with her spending her own money because it&#8217;s a money game folks, and Jerry Brown&#8217;s already got the union money tied up. </big></p>
<p><big>Whitman looks better in person than she does on TV (you can&#8217;t trust my crappy little cell phone camera). She is poised, well-spoken and confident &#8211; she looks and sounds like what you want a political candidate to look and sound like. I know all candidates aspire to that but most come up way short. She sounds sincere because I think she really is sincere &#8211; like her TV moto says &#8211; &#8216;say what you mean and mean what you say&#8217;. She also has a laser focus and is not easily jolted off-message &#8211;  which is a talent she will need in order to succeed. </big></p>
<p><big>She has three main platform issues and brings every other discussion around to how it relates to her big three:</big></p>
<ul>
<li><big>Jobs</big></li>
<li><big>Spending </big></li>
<li><big>Education</big></li>
</ul>
<p><big>Whitman points out that jobs are her top priority. Without jobs there is no revenue, there is no recovery, there is no hope. One job killer? Eliminate AB 32 &#8211; which drew rousing applause from the house. Next &#8211; cut taxes across the board &#8211; but not first. First you need to create jobs to get the revenue stream, then you cut taxes to super-charge the momentum of creating more jobs, streamline regulations and make California competitive in the job market again..</big></p>
<p><big>Second &#8211; cut spending. Judicious and consistent use of the blue-line veto is one avenue she plans to utilize, along with actually reducing the state workforce rather than just reducing the increase. This years budget was &#8216;slashed&#8217; all the way down to $85 Billion. Whitman suggested this is not as draconian as liberals would have you believe since the last time we had an $85 Billion budget was just 6 years ago. 2004 was a pretty good year in California &#8211; it&#8217;s just that when the money was rolling in SOME people who should have known better figured it would go on forever. She is again promising, as did Arnie, to review the relevancy pf departments, commissions and regulations. </big></p>
<p><big>Third &#8211; fix education. There&#8217;s no reason, given the amount of money we spend per pupil, which is among the highest in the country, that our students should rank where they do nationally, which is among the lowest. Maybe the 40% going to administration instead of students has something to do with it. Maybe tenuring dead wood forever has something to do with it. Maybe rewarding teachers that do a good job might help. </big></p>
<p><big>On why she wants to put herself in the position to try to govern a state many are convinced is ungovernable, she is very upbeat. She knows it is a challenge and one that her background uniquely qualifies her to tackle. She cites her real world corporate experience at Disney, Hasbro, Procter &amp; Gamble and, of course, the fact that she took eBay from 30 employees to 15,000. But in addition to the eBay experience, she also credits it with giving her a unique insight into the true job creation engine &#8211; small businesses showing how eBay helped create thousands of small businesses and created a cottage industry which she believes could be extended to the entire private sector. </big></p>
<p><big>She appears to be going into it with her eyes open &#8211; acknowledging the massive economic hurdles, legislative stalemate, union and special interest control, and the myriad of other problems we know exist in Sacramento. But she has a plan to deal with all of them &#8211; one at a time. She believes Arnold had the right idea when he started but he decided to tackle all the major issues right up front. He never fully recovered from the shellacking he took from the unions, teachers, nurses etc in the early days. </big></p>
<p><big>One thing you may not know &#8211; I&#8217;ve not seen it written about out here. Whitman is also an avowed conservationist and environmentalist. She recently <a href="http://www.telluridenews.com/articles/2010/03/03/news/doc4b8dca169007d595377300.txt">purchased hundreds of acres around the Alta Mines</a> outside Telluride Colorado, my home town. Previous owners were trying to keep the acreage out of the hands of developers and were encouraged by Whitmans commitment to leaving the land untouched. She also contributed nearly $1.5 million dollars to help the Town of Telluride purchase their Valley Floor a couple years ago &#8211; again making sure this land remained a natural asset rather than being heavily developed. If you&#8217;ve read my summer vacation posts, you&#8217;ve seen the pictures of the Elk herd that roams this land today instead of the condos and estate homes planned by the former owners. Whitman is taking some flack from the extreme enviro&#8217;s questioning how she can claim to be an environmentalist while advocating the overturn of AB32. But I think most reasonable people understand that there are true environmentalists on both sides of the political spectrum. They also understand that AB32 really has little to do with saving either the environment or jobs in this state. Whitman understands that.</big></p>
<p><big>I didn&#8217;t take any notes at the meet &amp; greet &#8211; I just wanted to get the flavor of the event, a feel for the candidate. I&#8217;ve gotta tell you I was impressed as were my political hack friends. If she only accomplishes 1/4 of what she plans to it will mark a tremendous improvement for California. And look at it this way &#8211; our alternative is Jerry Brown. Nuff said. </big></p>
<p><big><a href="http://www.megwhitman.com/"><img src="http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh317/genewunderlich/people/whitman0001.jpg" alt="meg whitman" /></a></big></p>
<p><big><br />
</big></p>
<p><big> </big></p>
<p><big><br />
</big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2010/03/03/meg-whitman-the-real-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meg Whitman discusses Ballot Props w/&#124; Sacramento Bee</title>
		<link>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2009/03/17/my-view-props-1a-1b-and-1c-cant-save-the-state-sacramento-opinion-sacramento-editorial-sacramento-bee/</link>
		<comments>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2009/03/17/my-view-props-1a-1b-and-1c-cant-save-the-state-sacramento-opinion-sacramento-editorial-sacramento-bee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Wunderlich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic and housing market outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meg whitman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadblog.srcar.org/2009/03/17/my-view-props-1a-1b-and-1c-cant-save-the-state-sacramento-opinion-sacramento-editorial-sacramento-bee/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meg Whitman, putative Gubernatorial candidate, provides her views on the May 9 state proposition ballot: My View: Props. 1A, 1B and 1C can&#8217;t save the state ShareThis By Meg Whitman Special to The Bee When facing tough decisions in business, the first thing I ask is, &#8220;What is the right thing to do?&#8221; Sometimes, doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 id="story_headline" style="font-family: Comic Sans MS;"><small></small><small>Meg Whitman, putative Gubernatorial candidate, provides her views on the May 9 state proposition ballot:</small></h1>
<h1 id="story_headline">My View: Props. 1A, 1B and 1C can&#8217;t save the state</h1>
<div class="share upper"><big><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js#tabs=email%2Cpost%2Cweb&amp;charset=utf-8&amp;style=rotate&amp;publisher=07b82a1a-1737-43ed-bfb1-03a19aa05a39&amp;headerbg=%23edf3f5&amp;linkfg=%23024a82" type="text/javascript"></script><span id="sharethis_0"><a class="stbutton stico_rotate" title="ShareThis via email, AIM, social bookmarking and networking sites, etc." href="javascript:void(0)"><span class="stbuttontext">ShareThis</span></a></span></big></div>
<div class="byline"><big> By Meg Whitman<br />
 Special to The Bee </big></div>
<p><!--&#038; /mi/pubsys/story/bug,    format=>q{</p>
<div id="bug" class="flora" title="Contact the Writer">[/mi/pubsys/story/bug]</div>
<p>} &#038;&#8211;><br />
<big><script>
  //$(document).ready(function(){
  //  $("#bug").dialog("autoOpen","false");
  //});
  </script></big></p>
<div class="published"><big>Published: Tuesday, Mar. 17, 2009 &#8211; 12:00 am  | Page 15A </big></div>
<p><!-- CLOSE: #story_header --></p>
<div id="articlebody" class="lingo_region"><big> </big><big> When facing tough decisions in business, the first thing I ask is, &#8220;What is the right thing to do?&#8221; Sometimes, doing the right thing is very straightforward. At other times, it can be painful. But a willingness to do what is right, regardless of the circumstances, demonstrates leadership. And it is how successful organizations are run.</big></p>
<p><big>As we all know, California is in crisis. Half a million people have lost their jobs over the last year. Others have taken pay cuts. Many have lost their homes.</big></p>
<p><big>Yet, in Sacramento, it is business as usual. Remarkably, as California slashes services and enacts $16 billion in new taxes, the state bureaucracy is protected and actually getting bigger. Since 1998, <a class="lingo_link" style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Georgia,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,Times,serif; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/government+spending/">government spending</a> in California has grown by 80 percent and the bureaucracy has increased by 28 percent. </big></p>
<p><big> </big><big> Is California 80 percent better? Of course not, and taxpayers have had it.</big></p>
<p><big>I oppose Proposition 1A (and its working partner, Proposition 1B). Proposition 1A is being sold as spending reform, but it is not. Proposition 1A is actually a sustained tax increase masquerading as reform, and it is terrible for California. For starters, Proposition 1A extends $16 billion in tax increases for two years and makes us among the highest-taxed people in <a class="lingo_link" style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Georgia,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,Times,serif; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/america/">America.</a> The last thing we need right now is two more years of higher taxes on sales, income and cars.</big></p>
<p><big>Moreover, Proposition 1A ties spending to revenues and could actually prevent the state from saving money. California should only spend what it needs to provide public services. The rest should be saved, or returned to taxpayers. It&#8217;s our money, after all.</big></p>
<p><big>And here&#8217;s what politicians aren&#8217;t telling you. Even if Proposition 1A passes, California will still be deeply in debt – according to the nonpartisan <a class="lingo_link" style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Georgia,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,Times,serif; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Legislative+Analyst%27s+Office/">Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office,</a> $8 billion in debt to be exact. That means Sacramento will probably call for more tax increases after the special election.</big></p>
<p><big>The real problem is that Californians are stuck with government they can&#8217;t afford. Sacramento needs to deal with that reality. Before asking taxpayers for more money, government should cut bureaucracy, cut spending further, improve efficiency and provide better services for less. Businesses do this all the time; why can&#8217;t government?</big></p>
<p><big>I oppose Proposition 1C because it is an ill-conceived scheme to borrow against future lottery revenues. In business, borrowing against future revenues, in essence borrowing against what you may make someday, is considered reckless. The same is true in government.</big></p>
<p><big>I support Propositions 1D and 1E, which reallocate money from special funds (for children&#8217;s services and mental health programs) that have a surplus to protect similar general fund programs. And I support Proposition 1F, which prohibits state politicians from getting raises whenever there is a deficit.</big></p>
<p><big>Time has run out. We cannot just keep throwing higher taxes on hardworking Californians indefinitely. We need courageous leadership in Sacramento now. And we need leaders who will honestly address the problem of a bloated bureaucracy and inefficient government Californians can no longer afford. </big></p>
<p><big> </big></p>
<div class="share lower"><big> <script src="http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js#tabs=email%2Cpost%2Cweb&amp;charset=utf-8&amp;style=rotate&amp;publisher=07b82a1a-1737-43ed-bfb1-03a19aa05a39&amp;headerbg=%23edf3f5&amp;linkfg=%23024a82" type="text/javascript"></script><span id="sharethis_1"><a class="stbutton stico_rotate" title="ShareThis via email, AIM, social bookmarking and networking sites, etc." href="javascript:void(0)"><span class="stbuttontext">ShareThis</span></a></span> </big></div>
<p><big> </big><br />
<hr />
<p class="storybug"><big><em><a class="lingo_link" style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Georgia,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,Times,serif; font-size: 15px; font-weight: 400; font-style: italic;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Meg+Whitman/">Meg Whitman</a> is the former president and CEO of eBay. She has formed an exploratory committee to seek the Republican nomination for governor of California in 2010.</em></big></p>
<p><big> </big></div>
<p>Posted using <a href="http://sharethis.com">ShareThis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gadblog.srcar.org/2009/03/17/my-view-props-1a-1b-and-1c-cant-save-the-state-sacramento-opinion-sacramento-editorial-sacramento-bee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

